Study Says Consumers Confused About "Going Green"
July 18, 2008
The Shelton Group recently conducted a national study, called Eco
Pulse, which asked consumers open-ended and multiple-choice
questions about green issues. What it found was a whole lot of
confusion, Brandweek reports. The good news is that
consumers are "going green." But the bad news is they are still
pretty green when it comes to understanding what the term really
means.
"Here's the big ah-ha!," said Suzanne Shelton, CEO of Shelton
Group, a Knoxville, Tenn.-based ad agency that specializes in
energy efficiency and sustainability. "If you were an alien and you
landed on the planet in April of this year, you would think that
the 'green' market was pretty mature because you'd be hearing about
it everywhere -- every newspaper, every TV show you turn on,
somebody is talking about being green. But this is not a mature
market."
For instance, the study found that while half (49%) of respondents
said a company's environmental record is important in their
purchasing decisions, but that number dropped to 21 percent when
consumers were asked if this had actually driven them to choose one
product over another. And only 7 percent could name the product
they purchased.
"What that tells you is even though we're talking the talk, it
isn't necessarily translating into action," Shelton said. "People
are interested in being green, but they don't necessarily know what
to do specifically, and when people are confused, they do
nothing."
The study also asked consumers to name which features a home would
need to have before they would consider it green. Four in 10 (42%)
said they didn't know, while 28 percent said solar, 12 percent said
compact fluorescent light bulbs and 10 percent named Energy Star
appliances. Nothing else really registered. In a second survey that
listed 17 features, consumers were asked to check those a home must
have before they'd deem it green. The average number was 10.4.
Even something as simple as defining what makes a green cleaning
product had many puzzled. While the top answer ("no harmful toxic
ingredients or chemicals") was on point, the runner-up ("the
packaging is made of recycled or recyclable materials") missed the
point entirely.
"We are still in the early phases of the product life cycle," said
Shelton, whose agency clients include BP Solar and the American
Institute of Architects. ". . . What we have to do as marketers is
help [consumers] understand it in bite-size ways."
Additionally, the study found that:
- Most Americans put their personal comfort ahead of the
environment. When asked, "Given a choice between your comfort, your
convenience or the environment, which do you most often choose?" 46
percent chose comfort and 31 percent chose the environment.
- A significant number (40%) admitted to negative or ambivalent
responses ("skeptical," "irritated," "guilty" or "unaffected") to
increased media attention regarding our impact on the environment,
while 60 percent answered in a positive fashion ("better educated"
or "glad").
- When asked, "How much do you agree or disagree with the following
statement? Global warming, or climate change, is occurring, and it
is primarily caused by human activity." 57 percent agreed or
strongly agreed with this statement.
- When asked why most companies that adopt environmentally friendly
practices do so, the most common response (47%) was "to make their
company look better to the public." Only 13 percent believed it was
"because their owners/shareholders care about the environment."
- The fact that a company makes a green product doesn't mean it
will be perceived as green if its manufacturing plants aren't. Only
4 percent of consumers chose "a company that has manufacturing
plants contaminated with chemical waste but manufactures wind
turbines to produce green power."
Study Says Consumers Confused About "Going Green"
July 18, 2008
The Shelton Group recently conducted a national study, called Eco Pulse, which asked consumers open-ended and multiple-choice questions about green issues. What it found was a whole lot of confusion, Brandweek reports. The good news is that consumers are "going green." But the bad news is they are still pretty green when it comes to understanding what the term really means.
"Here's the big ah-ha!," said Suzanne Shelton, CEO of Shelton Group, a Knoxville, Tenn.-based ad agency that specializes in energy efficiency and sustainability. "If you were an alien and you landed on the planet in April of this year, you would think that the 'green' market was pretty mature because you'd be hearing about it everywhere -- every newspaper, every TV show you turn on, somebody is talking about being green. But this is not a mature market."
For instance, the study found that while half (49%) of respondents said a company's environmental record is important in their purchasing decisions, but that number dropped to 21 percent when consumers were asked if this had actually driven them to choose one product over another. And only 7 percent could name the product they purchased.
"What that tells you is even though we're talking the talk, it isn't necessarily translating into action," Shelton said. "People are interested in being green, but they don't necessarily know what to do specifically, and when people are confused, they do nothing."
The study also asked consumers to name which features a home would need to have before they would consider it green. Four in 10 (42%) said they didn't know, while 28 percent said solar, 12 percent said compact fluorescent light bulbs and 10 percent named Energy Star appliances. Nothing else really registered. In a second survey that listed 17 features, consumers were asked to check those a home must have before they'd deem it green. The average number was 10.4.
Even something as simple as defining what makes a green cleaning product had many puzzled. While the top answer ("no harmful toxic ingredients or chemicals") was on point, the runner-up ("the packaging is made of recycled or recyclable materials") missed the point entirely.
"We are still in the early phases of the product life cycle," said Shelton, whose agency clients include BP Solar and the American Institute of Architects. ". . . What we have to do as marketers is help [consumers] understand it in bite-size ways."
Additionally, the study found that: - Most Americans put their personal comfort ahead of the environment. When asked, "Given a choice between your comfort, your convenience or the environment, which do you most often choose?" 46 percent chose comfort and 31 percent chose the environment.
- A significant number (40%) admitted to negative or ambivalent responses ("skeptical," "irritated," "guilty" or "unaffected") to increased media attention regarding our impact on the environment, while 60 percent answered in a positive fashion ("better educated" or "glad").
- When asked, "How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Global warming, or climate change, is occurring, and it is primarily caused by human activity." 57 percent agreed or strongly agreed with this statement.
- When asked why most companies that adopt environmentally friendly practices do so, the most common response (47%) was "to make their company look better to the public." Only 13 percent believed it was "because their owners/shareholders care about the environment."
- The fact that a company makes a green product doesn't mean it will be perceived as green if its manufacturing plants aren't. Only 4 percent of consumers chose "a company that has manufacturing plants contaminated with chemical waste but manufactures wind turbines to produce green power."
|